Burma or East Falls?

[Image: The new Burmese capital of Naypyidaw, photographed by the Associated Press; via the BBC].


I was wondering around some of the architectural blogs that I read… and oops I ran into the photo above. This is amazing. What an unpredictable moment. This looks like the building going on just around the corner where I live.

I’ll add a comparison photo later.

technorati tags:, , ,

Blogged with Flock

rosey life at stellarvisions

A little spring cleaning at Stellarvisions. We’ve moved out a bunch of clutter to expose more shared space that encourages relaxation and conversation.

We were able to do a projected presentation for a group of a dozen folks now that we have opened up the space. The color in the photo is the true hue of our western evening light.

The sculpture next to the soon to be replaced couch is by Allan Greenberg. You can see his work at the Abington Art Center, Fleisher Art Memorial, and various other venues in the area.

technorati tags:, , ,

Blogged with Flock

a climate in crisis

7 7 07

Live Earth will use the global reach of music to engage people on amass scale to combat our climate crisis. Live Earth will bring togethermore than 150 of the world’s top musicians for 24-hours of music from 7concerts across all 7 continents. Live Earth will bring together anaudience of more than 2 billion at the concerts and through television,radio, film, and the Internet. That audience, and the proceeds from theevent, will create the foundation for a new, multi-year global effortto combat the climate crisis led by Vice President Al Gore. Kevin Wall,Worldwide Executive Producer of Live 8, is producing Live Earth.

What do you think when you listen to the morning news and are told the air quality is unhealthy?

from the weather channel…

How is the Air Quality Index calculated?
To measure air quality, networks of monitors record the concentrationsof the major pollutants at more than a thousand locations across theU.S. each day. These raw measurements are then converted into AQIvalues using standard formulas developed by EPA. An AQI value iscalculated for each of the individual pollutants in an area(ground-level ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfurdioxide, and nitrogen dioxide). The pollutant with the highest AQI isused as the overall AQI reading for that day and is listed as theprincipal pollutant.

What do the color codes mean?
EPA has assigned a specific color to each AQI category to make iteasier for people to understand quickly the significance of forecastedair pollution levels in their communities. For example, the colororange means that conditions are “unhealthy for sensitive groups”; thecolor red means that conditions may be “unhealthy” for everyone, and soon.

check out:



loads of resources

Blogged with Flock


Last night was community movie night at Sherman Mills. The feature was KOYAANISQATSI.

Title screen for Koyaanisqatsithe bombtwinkies

ko.yaa.nis.katsi (from the Hopi language), n. 1. crazy life. 2. life in turmoil. 3. life disintegrating. 4. life out of balance. 5. a state of life that calls for another way of living.

Translation of the Hopi Prophecies Sung in KOYAANISQATSI
“If we dig precious things from the land, we will invite disaster.”
“Near the Day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.”
“A container of ashes might one day be thrown from the sky which could burn the land and boil the oceans.”

I’ve seen this film more than a dozen times. It’s just as good as the first time I saw it… maybe better. Life experience creates new narratives and juxtopositions. Koyaanisqatsi is the first film in a trilogy. The second film Powaqqatsi is focuses on natives of the third world. And Naqoyqatsi is about civilized violence.

Na-qoy-qatsi: (nah koy’ kahtsee) N. From the Hopi Language. 1. A life of killing each other 2. War as a way of life. 3. (Interpreted) Civilized violence.
-end credit definition from the feature film “Naqoyqatsi”.

These are films one must experience and talk about.

I want MY country back.

We can start by using the New York Times to do list for this Congress.
NYT EDITORIAL Published: March 4, 2007

The Bush administration’s assault on some of the founding principles of American democracy marches onward despite the Democratic victory in the 2006 elections. The new Democratic majorities in Congress can block the sort of noxious measures that the Republican majority rubber-stamped. But preventing new assaults on civil liberties is not nearly enough.

Five years of presidential overreaching and Congressional collaboration continue to exact a high toll in human lives, America’s global reputation and the architecture of democracy. Brutality toward prisoners, and the denial of their human rights, have been institutionalized; unlawful spying on Americans continues; and the courts are being closed to legal challenges of these practices.

It will require forceful steps by this Congress to undo the damage. A few lawmakers are offering bills intended to do just that, but they are only a start. Taking on this task is a moral imperative that will show the world the United States can be tough on terrorism withoutsacrificing its humanity and the rule of law.

Today we’re offering a list — which, sadly, is hardly exhaustive — of things that need to be done to reverse the unwise and lawless policies of President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney. Many will require a rewrite of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, an atrocious measure pushed through Congress with the help of three Republican senators, Arlen Specter, Lindsey Graham and John McCain; Senator McCain lent his moral authority to improving one part of the bill and thus obscured its many other problems.

•Our list starts with three fundamental tasks:

Restore Habeas Corpus
One of the new act’s most indecent provisions denies anyone Mr. Bush labels an “illegal enemy combatant” the ancient right to challenge his imprisonment in court. The arguments for doing this were specious. Habeas corpus is nothing remotely like a get-out-of-jail-free card for terrorists, as supporters would have you believe. It is a way to sort out those justly detained from those unjustly detained. It will not “clog the courts,” as Senator Graham claims. Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the Democratic chairman of the Judiciary Committee, has a worthy bill that would restore habeas corpus. It is essential to bringing integrity to the detention system and reviving the United States’ credibility.

Stop Illegal Spying
Mr. Bush’s program of intercepting Americans’ international calls and e-mail messages without a warrant has not ceased. The agreement announced recently — under which a secret court supposedly gave its blessing to the program — did nothing to restore judicial process or ensure that Americans’ rights are preserved. Congress needs to pass a measure, like one proposed by Senator Dianne Feinstein, to force Mr. Bush to obey the law that requires warrants for electronic surveillance.

Ban Torture, Really
The provisions in the Military Commissions Act that Senator McCain trumpeted as a ban on torture are hardly that. It is still largely up to the president to decide what constitutes torture and abuse for the purpose of prosecuting anyone who breaks the rules. This amounts to rewriting the Geneva Conventions and puts every American soldier at far greater risk if captured. It allows the president to decide in secret what kinds of treatment he will permit at the Central Intelligence Agency’s prisons. The law absolves American intelligence agents and their bosses of any acts of torture and abuse they have already committed.

Many of the tasks facing Congress involve the way the United States takes prisoners, and how it treats them. There are two sets of prisons in the war on terror. The military runs one set in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantánamo Bay. The other is even more shadowy, run by the C.I.A. at secret places.

Close the C.I.A. Prisons
When the Military Commissions Act passed, Mr. Bush triumphantly announced that he now had the power to keep the secret prisons open. He cast this as a great victory for national security. It was a defeat for America’s image around the world. The prisons should be closed.

Account for ‘Ghost Prisoners’
The United States has to come clean on all of the “ghost prisoners” it has in the secret camps. Holding prisoners without any accounting violates human rights norms. Human Rights Watch says it has identified nearly 40 men and women who have disappeared into secret American-run prisons.

Ban Extraordinary Rendition
This is the odious practice of abducting foreign citizens and secretly flying them to countries where everyone knows they will be tortured. It is already illegal to send a prisoner to a country if there is reason to believe he will be tortured. The administration’s claim that it got “diplomatic assurances” that prisoners would not be abused is laughable.

A bill by Representative Edward Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts, would require the executive branch to list countries known to abuse and torture prisoners. No prisoner could be sent to any of them unless the secretary of state certified that the country’s government no longer abused its prisoners or offered a way to verify that a prisoner will not be mistreated. It says “diplomatic assurances” are not sufficient.

Congress needs to completely overhaul the military prisons for terrorist suspects, starting with the way prisoners are classified. Shortly after 9/11, Mr. Bush declared all members of Al Qaeda and the Taliban to be “illegal enemy combatants” not entitled to the protections of the Geneva Conventions or American justice. Over time, the designation was applied to anyone the administration chose, including some United States citizens and the entire detainee population of Gitmo.

To address this mess, the government must:

Tighten the Definition of Combatant
“Illegal enemy combatant” is assigned a dangerously broad definition in the Military Commissions Act. It allows Mr. Bush — or for that matter anyone he chooses to designate to do the job — to apply this label to virtually any foreigner anywhere, including those living legally in the United States.

Screen Prisoners Fairly and Effectively
When the administration began taking prisoners in Afghanistan, it did not much bother to screen them. Hundreds of innocent men were sent to Gitmo, where far too many remain to this day. The vast majority will never even be brought before tribunals and still face indefinite detention without charges.

Under legal pressure, Mr. Bush created “combatant status review tribunals,” but they are a mockery of any civilized legal proceeding. They take place thousands of miles from the point of capture, and often years later. Evidence obtained by coercion and torture is permitted. The inmates do not get to challenge this evidence. They usually do not see it.

The Bush administration uses the hoary “fog of war” dodge to justify the failure to screen prisoners, saying it is not practical to do that on the battlefield. That’s nonsense. It did not happen in Afghanistan, and often in Iraq, because Mr. Bush decided just to ship the prisoners off to Gitmo.

Prisoners designated as illegal combatants are subject to trial rules out of the Red Queen’s playbook. The administration refuses to allow lawyers access to 14 terrorism suspects transferred in September from C.I.A. prisons to Guantánamo. It says that if they had a lawyer, they might say that they were tortured or abused at the C.I.A. prisons, and anything that happened at those prisons is secret.

At first, Mr. Bush provided no system of trial at the Guantánamo camp. Then he invented his own military tribunals, which were rightly overturned by the Supreme Court. Congress then passed the Military Commissions Act, which did not fix the problem. Some tasks now for Congress:

Ban Tainted Evidence
The Military Commissions Act and the regulations drawn up by the Pentagon to put it into action, are far too permissive on evidence obtained through physical abuse or coercion. This evidence is unreliable. The method of obtaining it is an affront.

Ban Secret Evidence
Under the Pentagon’s new rules for military tribunals, judges are allowed to keep evidence secret from a prisoner’s lawyer if the government persuades the judge it is classified. The information that may be withheld can include interrogation methods, which would make it hard, if not impossible, to prove torture or abuse.

Better Define ‘Classified’ Evidence
The military commission rules define this sort of secret evidence as “any information or material that has been determined by the United States government pursuant to statute, executive order or regulation to require protection against unauthorized disclosure for reasons of national security.” This is too broad, even if a president can be trusted to exercise the power fairly and carefully. Mr. Bush has shown he cannot be trusted to do that.

Respect the Right to Counsel
Soon after 9/11, the Bush administration allowed the government to listen to conversations and intercept mail between some prisoners and their lawyers. This had the effect of suspending their right to effective legal representation. Since then, the administration has been unceasingly hostile to any lawyers who defend detainees. The right to legal counsel does not exist to coddle serial terrorists or snarl legal proceedings. It exists to protect innocent people from illegal imprisonment.

Beyond all these huge tasks, Congress should halt the federal government’s race to classify documents to avoid public scrutiny — 15.6 million in 2005, nearly double the 2001 number. It should also reverse the grievous harm this administration has done to the Freedom of Information Act by encouraging agencies to reject requests for documents whenever possible. Congress should curtail F.B.I. spying on nonviolent antiwar groups and revisit parts of the Patriot Act that allow this practice.

The United States should apologize to a Canadian citizen and a German citizen, both innocent, who were kidnapped and tortured by American agents.

Oh yes, and it is time to close the Guantánamo camp. It is a despicable symbol of the abuses committed by this administration (with Congress’s complicity) in the name of fighting terrorism.

Bush… Promises Aid

The headlines I read in my evening survey of the news was a grim reminder of what this man has wrought on my beloved country.
He surveys the damage.
He promises…

a young woman goes to war

I scan the front page and this image sits above the fold. This is a young woman being hugged by her dad. He has to go to work and she has to go to Iraq. She is 18.

George Bush too much for this nation to bear.

i want an iphone!

Ok. I have to have one. Not because it’s another amazingly designed product by Apple. Not because it has a multitouch interface. Not because it can also play my itunes, audio books, music videos, and Comedy Central shows. No, for only one single thing… accessing my voicemail without having to listen to each message in successive order.

I know it took me awhile to write this post. I had to count to 100 a few times to get myself under control. Apple has again combined technologies and customer need to create an innovative product. Now if they can get the price to something I can afford.

Haven’t heard anything about the iphone yet? Been under a rock? Check it out at http://www.apple.com

technorati tags:, , , ,

Blogged with Flock